ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

ଅର୍ଥନୀତିର ସ୍ଥିତି

Economic Survey 2016–17 is not what it should be—telling the truth about the economy without fear or favour.

The translations of EPW Editorials have been made possible by a generous grant from the H T Parekh Foundation, Mumbai. The translations of English-language Editorials into other languages spoken in India is an attempt to engage with a wider, more diverse audience. In case of any discrepancy in the translation, the English-language original will prevail.

In our understanding, a liberal intellectual is expected to speak and write the truth without fear or favour, besides, of course, other important attributes, among which are a questioning and a critical attitude towards the world around him/her. Going by the governments Economic Survey 201617 (ES) released on 31 January, a day before the presentation of the Union Budget 201718, one might have serious doubts about the liberalism of the economists and the economic bureaucrats responsible for the production of that state-of-the-economy version. To be fair to them, given that the political spectrum itself has shifted quite significantly to the right, and the fact that both the Congress party and the Bharatiya Janata Party, the two main national parties, are far from being liberal, liberals in the government bureaucracy often seem to forget what a liberal is meant to be.

The writers of this years ES, or for that matter, any of the ESs that we have read in the past, do not seem to even think that they should look at the state of the economy in the light of what the finance minister and the Prime Minister had promised when it was presented last year. The Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had claimed that his budget was pro-farmer and pro-poor, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi had even stated that the aim was to double farmer income in five years. (The farmers who took him seriously would have assumed that he meant this in real terms, namely, adjusting for inflation.) Liberals in government must surely also be cynical; for everyone discounts the official hype that goes with the marketingpackaging, more preciselyof union budgets. But, should not an examination of the state of the economy tell the public how the government fared in terms of the priorities it set for itself? Or were Jaitley and Modi simply engaging in a mockery of our farmers? They thought that opening the marketing of food products like fruits and vegetables to multinational businesses would bring in a bonanza for the small cultivators of such products. They did not think that reversing the decline in public investment in agriculture as a proportion of agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) could have helped advance the objectives they had set for their government.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.