ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

‘वित्तीय निवारण व ठेव विमा विधेयका’चं पुनरुज्जीवन झालं तर

When reintroduced, will the FRDI Bill address the issues of financial instability?


The translations of EPW Editorials have been made possible by a generous grant from the H T Parekh Foundation, Mumbai. The translations of English-language Editorials into other languages spoken in India is an attempt to engage with a wider, more diverse audience. In case of any discrepancy in the translation, the English-language original will prevail.


Following the recent meeting of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC) held on 7 November 2019that had the strengthening of the resolution framework of the financial sector of the country on its agendathere is an emerging speculation about whether the current government will resurrect the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance (FRDI) Bill, 2017, particularly with reference to the banking sector. Recall that this government had revoked the bill within a year of its introduction in 2017, mainly due to the widespread scepticism about the bail-in clause in the bill, which allegedly can make the depositors of a failing financial institution share the burden of resolution cost by foregoing parts of their deposits with the institution. With household financial savings behaviour in India showing a skewed preference towards bank deposits in the last two decades, the security of these deposits is indeed a matter of significance.

As per media reports, the amendments to the FRDI Bill, 2017now renamed the Financial Sector Development and Regulation (Resolution) Bill, 2019are being worked out for three crucial issues: first, to increase the deposit insurance cover of customers; second, to iron out the contentious issues related to the bail-in clause; and third, to decide whether this resolution framework should apply to the public sector banks. At a time when the public sector banks have come under the stress of bad loans, increasing the deposit insurance coverage limit would be a welcome approach for reinforcing depositors confidence in the banking system in general, and the public sector banks in particular. Notwithstanding the argument about the inclusiveness or otherwise of the coverage limit of the deposit insurance scheme, a relevant approach of looking at these amendments, and so to say the resolution framework on the whole, is through the lens of systemic stability, especially in the current scenario in the Indian banking sector.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.