ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Ecological Fiscal Transfers and State-level Budgetary Spending in India

Analysing the Flypaper Effects

The empirical evidence of flypaper effects in the ecological fiscal spending in India is examined. Using the panel data models, it is analysed whether the intergovernmental fiscal transfers, or the states’ own income, determine the expenditure commitments on ecology at the state level. The econometric results show that the intergovernmental fiscal transfers rather than the states’ own income determine ecological expenditure at subnational levels in India. The results hold when the models are controlled for ecological outcomes and demographic variables.

This article was presented at the International Institute of Public Finance (IIPF) 2021 meetings organised by the University of Iceland. Thanks are due to the discussant of the article and the session participants of IIPF meetings for their valuable comments and suggestions.

With the progress of fiscal decentralisation, many countries have focused on environmental commitments at the subnational government level. The principle of subsidiarity says that the responsibility for providing a particular service should be assigned to the jurisdiction closest to people. Such decentralised decisions in climate change commitments are getting attention worldwide ex post Paris accord on climate change. However, the inter-jurisdictional competition to attract mobile capital by trading (lowering) environmental regulations lead to race to the bottom and pollution havens. Empirical evidence reveals this continuous tension between the principle of subsidiarity and the race to the bottom.

In the intergovernmental fiscal framework, three functions of environmental quality have been developed. The first considers environmental quality as a pure international public good for which a global solution is required, irrespective of its location. The second case considers environmental quality as a pure local public good. The principle of subsidiarity is directly applicable to this second case. The third case, which is most common in practice, deals with the effects of inter-jurisdictional externalities, including water and air pollution.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.