ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

India’s Tryst with Liberalisation

India after Liberalisation: An Overview by Bimal Jalan, India: HarperCollins , 2021, pp 240, $21.94 (paperback).

Indias promising yet complex and chaotic political economy had witnessed many dramatic twists and turns ever since the country got its independence in 1947. Unlike the East and the Southeast Asian countries, Indias economic transition was somewhat slow and haphazard. Nevertheless, the popular narrative of India being a severely regulated economy till 1991 could be a misnomer. As Mukherji (2009) points out, it remained only moderately regulated throughout the 1950s and late 1960s, thanks to the socio-economic vision of the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. The Nehruvian idea of nation-building was starkly different from the Gandhian project, which envisaged economically self-sufficient villages as the building blocks of development. Nehru, with his socialist and somewhat statist approach, envisioned nothing less than a structural transformation of the economy and society as a whole from its archaic constancies. However, Lal Bahadur Shastri, who assumed the Prime Ministers office after the death of Nehru, was not a great fan of the Nehruvian economic vision and tried to reverse the inward-looking policies systematically. Nevertheless, Shastris unexpected death closed Indias trade-oriented route prematurely (Kudaisya 2002).

Between the late 1960s and mid-1970s, the countrys political economy had witnessed a gradual but significant change. Mukherji (2009) observes that Indira Gandhi was not just following the ideological legacy of her father by diligently placing herself as the crusader of pro-poor policies and promoting populist slogans like garibi hatao (abolish poverty). A deeper analysis would reveal that there could be a covert political agenda to defuse the influence of the powerful syndicate group in her party who were more sympathetic to the business class. Nevertheless, Indira Gandhis efforts in this direction backfired, and the policies designed to endorse egalitarian distribution eventually evolved into anti-capitalist rhetoric and licence raj, which adversely affected economic growth.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.