ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Quest for an Indian Manufacturing Future

Industrialisation for Employment and Growth in India: Lessons from Small Firm Clusters and Beyond edited by R Nagaraj, New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2021; p 260, `950 (hardback).

The manufacturing sector occupies a special place in the theory and practice of economic development and structural change. Historical experience as well as economic theory strongly suggest that sustained increases in per capita income occur only after the manufacturing sector reaches a certain critical size in terms of the share of GDP as well as employment. Compared to agriculture, construction or services, aggregate output growth in manufacturing is more strongly correlated with aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) growth due to extensive backward and forward linkages of this sector with the rest of the economy. And due to economies of scale and embeddedness of new technology in new investments, the growth of output causes productivity growth in this sector. These Kaldor Laws along with the capacity of manufacturing to show unconditional convergence or catch-up of labour productivity independent of country-specific characteristics make this sector special (Rodrik 2011; Storm 2015).1 In late industrialising countries such as India, the problem takes on a new dimensionhow to develop industrial capacity, infrastructure and competitiveness in a global economy consisting of far more efficient firms? A vigorous debate has raged on the extent to which industrial policies like subsidy and trade policies like tariffs contributed to late industrialisation success stories like South Korea, Taiwan or more recently China (Amsden 2001; Cherif and Hasanov 2019; Lane 2021). In the 21st century, the story of industrialisation has met a new plot twistthe challenge of climate change.

With the Indian policy commitment to manufacturing having received a new boost in the form of Make in India, the questions that confront us today are the following: Does Rodriks (2016) thesis of premature deindustrialisation indicate that it is too late for late industrialisation? Is there a path to industrialisation that can capitalise on the special properties of manufacturing mentioned above, while avoiding the 20th century ecological pitfalls? Can such a path draw on Indias strengths, namely an enormous number of small firm clusters all across the country, often drawing on decades, if not centuries of manufacturing tradition? And perhaps most importantly, can manufacturing create enough employment to contribute to Indias structural transitionsomething that it has thus far failed to do?

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.