ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Where Boundaries Bleed

The Many Subtleties of George W Grierson’s Linguistic Survey of India

Colonialism and Knowledge in Grierson’s Linguistic Survey of India edited by Javed Majeed, London and New York: Routledge, 2019; pp 274, £36.99.

Nation and Region in Grierson’s Linguistic Survey of India edited by Javed Majeed, London and New York: Routledge, 2019; pp 238, £36.99.

The true heart of Javed Majeeds analysis of George W Griersons Linguistic Survey of India (LSI) rests in two adjacent chaptersMapping Languages and Double Names. Here, Majeed draws our attention to the vocabulary with which Grierson writes of the dialect continuum in India: dialects overflow their assumed boundaries, differences melt, lines of distinction between dialects appear blurred, boundaries bleed, linguistic zones shade into each other and each language name reveals a further swirl of names. The two chapters bring to the surface an idiom of doubt and a narrative of indefiniteness in Griersons colonial knowledge production (Nation and Region in Griersons Linguistic Survey of India, pp 5687).

Majeeds fundamental, consistent and singular contribution is to remind us that Grierson, while steadfastly participating in regimes of colonial authority and linguistic cataloguing, also allowed the LSI to be undercut by countervailing narratives at each juncture of the LSIs three-decade-long career. In doing so, his two-volume study (Colonialism and Knowledge in Griersons Linguistic Survey of India and Nation and Region in Griersons Linguistic Survey of India) is a vastly complex and nuanced analysis of Griersons conclusions on the linguistic ecology of the South Asia region. However, equally, the chapters Mapping Languages and Double Names are an example of a deeply insightful and refreshing meta-analysis, drawing attention to Griersons use of metaphor, idiom, simile, and turn of phrase. They highlight the rich possibilities of research on colonial era documents. They also alert us to the implications of an unusual weaving of disciplinary acumen that Majeeda scholar of English literature, Urdu poetry and prose, travel writing, autobiography, and postcolonial theorybrings to an analysis of the LSI. In the past, similar subjects of study have drawn the attention of anthropologists (Cohn 1997) and historians (Raman 2012).

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.