ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Methodological Challenges in Estimating the Impact of Improved Sanitation on Child Health Outcomes

A Review of Studies in India

In this article, the findings of selected observational studies are contrasted with that of randomised experiments conducted to estimate the impact of improved sanitation on child health in India. The estimation bias exists and could be due to the measurement error in sanitation indicators, which remained unaddressed by most observational studies. The sanitation indicators used and the inadequate questions asked to measure it, result in a measurement error.

This article aims to highlight the problems encountered in measuring the causal effect of sanitation on child health in observational studies. The focus is on the methodological issues related to sanitation indicators, health indicators, confounding bias, and selection bias, along with the controls arising in the process of assessing the impact of development efforts to improve sanitation practices on health outcomes.

The impact of improved sanitation on child health has been assessed by various studies (Hammer and Spears 2016). Based on the approaches used in the estimation, the literature on the impact of improved sanitation on health outcomes can be divided into two strands: first, those studies that use randomised controlled experiments, and second, those that are based on observational data. The randomised experiments provide better estimates of causality by removing the biases originating from confounding. In this article, we summarise the findings of five important randomised controlled experiments; two conducted in Kenya and Bangladesh (published in 2018); two conducted in India (one each in Madhya Pradesh and Odisha) in 2014; and one in Mali in 2015. There is a consensus in the findings of these randomised experiments that despite a significant increase in toilet coverage and reduction in open defecation, the prevalence of diarrhoea (reported for a period of one week) among children (less than five years) did not reduce, except in Bangladesh where diarrhoea reduction was modest (5.7% in controlled group and 3.5% in treated group) (Clasen et al 2014; Patil et al 2014; Pickering et al 2015; Null et al 2018; Luby et al 2018).

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.