ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Two Papers on Judicial Bias in India

Two papers studying bias in judicial decision-making in India using large data sets have come to very different conclusions. One examines bail decisions and finds that childhood exposure to communal riots seems to influence whether a judge is likely to grant bail. The other examines convictions and finds no trace of similar bias on grounds of religion or gender. Both papers shed light, in different ways, on the working of India’s legal system and are not necessarily contradictory.

 

Judges are supposed to carry out their judicial duties without fear or favour, ill will or malice. Some variations of these words are found in the oaths of office administered to judges, from the chief justice of India down to the judicial magistrate. Each case before them is unique and has to be decided on its own merits. However, it is not uncommon to see allegations of bias against Indian judges, on the basis of caste, religion, gender, or other such criteria. Such allegations do have basis in reality, but is such biased decision-making among judges systematic? While there are biases, no doubt, built into the system against certain groups, does this necessarily translate into adverse verdicts against them by judges?

Two recent attempts have been made in answering this question but have arrived at what seem to be two opposite results, provoking more questions than providing answers. In The Early Origins of Judicial Bias in Bail Decisions: Evidence from Early Childhood Exposure to HinduMuslim Riots in India, Nitin Kumar Bharti and Sutanuka Roy find that district court judges in Uttar Pradesh, who have had early childhood exposure to communal riots, tend to deny bail more often than their counterparts who have not had such exposure (Bharti and Roy 2021). In Measuring Gender and Religious Bias in the Indian Judiciary, Elliott Ash, Sam Asher, Aditi Bhowmick, Daniel Chen, Tanaya Devi, Christoph Goessmann, Paul Novosad, and Bilal Siddiqi find that there is no in-group bias on the basis of religion or gender when it comes to convictions in criminal cases in trial courts (Ash et al 2021).

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.