ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Government and Labour: Return of Dialogue?

Worker’s organisations are crucial to the government’s planned labour policy measures.

 

The union minister of labour recently held a meeting with the leaders from the central trade unions (CTUs). What was seen as a token courtesy meeting, has led to reports that the government is interested in resuming some form of dialogue with the CTUs. Reports point at the governments inclination towards holding the Indian Labour Conference (ILC). This is not surprising considering how labour-related issues have dominated the public imagination during the COVID-19 pandemic, most starkly seen in the huge migrant exodus from the cities during the first lockdown in MarchApril 2020. The National Database of Unorganised Workers (NDUW), an initiative focused on enumerating the unorganised workforce along with the launch of the e-Shram portal are part of the governments efforts to ensure workers access to social security benefits. With the operationalisation of the much-touted labour codes still uncertainamidst unfulfilled employer concerns and CTU resistancethe government appears to be stretching its arm out, in its characteristic ad hoc style, to cover its gross misadventures with respect to labour and employment.

The ILC, first held in 1942 (as the national labour conference and the ILC from 1945), under the chairpersonship of B R Ambedkar, is the principal tripartite body, which includes representatives from central, state and union territory governments, CTUs and employers organisations. In determining broader legislative and policy matters related to labour, as well as discussions between the different parties involved, it has been the institutional bulwark of tripartism in labour politics in India. While tripartism in the Indian context has had a mixed history, with an overt presence of the statean inheritance from colonial labour administrationthere is undoubtedly an array of tripartite arrangements such as wage boards, labour boards, standing labour committees and national labour commissions that emerge from this tradition. It has, in many ways, shaped the basis of labour policy across different sectors. The ILC has also allowed for bringing together diverse traditions in the trade union movement, along with employers into a dialogue that was seen to ensure some bare minimum framework for industrial relations, in India. While its regular occurrence has consistently provided a space for dialogue, the current dispensations failure to hold the ILC for almost six years, in the midst of enacting the most drastic overhaul of the labour legislation, appears to be in line with their overall method of steamrolling through institutions for dialogue and deliberation.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 17th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.