ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Towards a Political Etymology of Sedition

Criminalisation of sedition is normatively inconsistent with the value framework of democracy.

 

Anushka Singh writes:

The Supreme Court has observed that the law of sedition (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code [IPC]) is colonial and stale and is being misused by the executive, hence merits a review possibly to be struck down. This observation branches off into two different yet intersecting analytic propositions which have a bearing on the normative relationship between sedition and democracy. First, the critique of the sedition law as colonial, not in a temporal sense but in its function, problematises its very existence after independence by way of a binary construct between democracy and colonialism regardless of its postcolonial use. Second, its critique on the grounds of misuse by the executive shifts the gaze on the working of law disconnected with the letter of the law and its colonial origin is cited as an argument against the law only as an afterthought. Putting the two together, one may askif the perniciousness of its use routinely by the political executive was not exposed, would Indian democracy still be debating the viability of the sedition law and expressing discomfort with its colonial antecedent? The response to this question transcends an analysis of Section 124A and delves deeper into the meaning of the act of sedition and the problematic it formulates for a constitutional democracy like India.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.