ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

The Politics of Coinage in the Early

Colonial Brahmaputra Valley

Several gaps exist in the study of the colonial economic history of India’s North East. A comprehensive analysis of the archival material reveals the politics of coinage in the early colonial Brahmaputra Valley, and how it worked to strengthen the rule of the East India Company.

 

The author is thankful to the reviewer of the Economic & Political Weekly for their comments and suggestions to improve this article.
 

The economic history of colonial North East India is understudied. Coinage and monetary policies in the region are further neglected in the existing historiography. The study of the policies and politics of coinage can help us to understand how monetary policies influence the lives of the people who use the currency. With the Treaty of Yandabo of 1826, almost entire North East India became a part of the British empire. An Ahom king was reinstated in upper Assam till the mid-1830s. Subsequently, upper Assam too was brought under British rule. The direct British rule brought policy changes. The developments that had happened in the decades of the 1820s to the 1830s had their impact on the political economic history of colonial as well as postcolonial Assam. The East India Company (EIC) asserted their political authority by regulating currencies. This article is an attempt to see the possible reasons that had motivated the company to follow a monetisation policy, and how the findings are relevant to the present day.

The available works of literature on monetary circulations and the polity associated with it suggest that money/currency is an important instrument to control the people who use/need it. John Lockes (1689) theory of property can be studied to understand the usefulness of the invention of money. Specifically, the invention of money solves the problem of over-accumulation of land by man. Money can be used in exchange for extra land cleared by a man, thereby maintaining the wealth of the man while not hurting fellowmens interest in using land (Locke 1689).

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.