ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Debating Supreme Court Reform

US President Joseph R Biden’s newly set up commission to recommend reform of the United States Supreme Court has brought to the forefront the “political” role of constitutional courts. While the US Supreme Court inhabits a vastly different legal, constitutional and political sphere from its Indian counterpart, nonetheless there are interesting parallels given common shared values towards the independence of the judiciary and constitutional governance.


On 9 April 2021, United States (US) President Joseph R Biden announced that he was setting up a 30 member commission to study the functioning of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and propose reforms where needed. The composition of the commission was decidedly bipartisan with leading legal academics and lawyers, irrespective of their political or jurisprudential views, forming part of the commission. The immediate impulse for the creation of the commission seems to be circumstances under which the last three appointments to the SCOTUS were made (Shear and Hulse 2021).

According to the US Constitution, appointments to the SCOTUS are made directly by the President but the same has to be based on the advice and consent of the US senate.1 Intended as a check on the Presidents powers this means that nominees to the SCOTUS need to receive the approval of a majority of the current 100 member senate.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.