ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Lessons from #MeToo

Where Are We Now?

With #MeToo having taken the world by storm in the last few years, reflecting on debates in the Indian context reveals some important lessons. Due process is one of them but is not the key takeaway; attention must be paid to how feminist solidarities are being forged. Further, contextualising it within the changing nature of the nation state makes #MeToo stand out in the trajectory of feminist movements in India, as being one that does not engage with the state or any institution. It thus embodies what Latin American feminists have called “politics in feminine,” in which politics of desire unseat the rights-based focus of such movements.

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewer whose suggested edits and comments have greatly improved and strengthened the arguments being put forth in this article.

In 2017, the #MeToo began spreading across the world on social media after reports emerged alleging that Harvey Weinstein, the Hollywood film mogul, had been serially sexually harassing and assaulting several women. The moment has been acknowledged as the beginning of the #MeToo movement, and with the hashtag acquiring different forms and meanings in different places (#WoYeShi or MeToo in China, #BalanceTonPorc or denounce your pig in France, # QuellaVoltaChe or that time when in Italy, and so on), the movement has changed and adapted to contexts that are far removed from Hollywood, or even the first world alone.

The MeToo movement as it took place in India has called for much introspection and rethinking of strategies in the larger trajectory of feminist movements in India. The two most prominent debates on the movement had to do with the methodology it adopted, and its accessibility; both of which became intersecting contentions. A statement by feminists on, responding to Raya Sarkars List of Sexual Harassers in Academia (LoSHA) in 2017, which contained a list of prominent men from Indian academia who were accused anonymously of sexual harassment, asserted that it was important to uphold norms of due process and in the same breath questioned the caste identity of Sarkar on Twitter.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 12th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.