ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Reimagining the Idea of a University in India

In response to the editor’s column, “University as an Idea’’ by Gopal Guru (EPW, 11 January 2020) and Swatahsiddha Sarkar’s article, “The Idea of a University in India” (EPW, 4 April 2020), this article seeks to begin a critical examination of the normative ideas that were presupposed in the earlier articles.

The editors column University as an Idea by Gopal Guru (EPW, 11 January 2020) and Swatahsiddha Sarkars The Idea of a University in India (EPW, 4 April 2020) that engage with the current scenario in Indian universities presuppose and build upon a pre-existing normative idea, eliding in the process any critical examination of the normative idea itself. Sarkar seems to provide an exalted status to epistemic knowledge and posits the quest for epistemic knowledge as the primary idea of a university, but the rationale for the same is not clear. A similar lack of critical engagement characterises Gurus short column wherein he states, without explanation, that Universities, in fact, are institutions that institutionalise ideas, which in turn embody in them universal human values. This is a trend that can be seen across recent commentaries on Indian universities in the print media and academia, wherein both the left and the right take it for granted that their ideal of a universityeither as a promoter of social revolution, or as a space to further national interestsis what the university ought to be. Taking a step back and thinking through our conception of the idea of a university is hence necessary not just for conceptual clarity, but also to open very real avenues for reimagining and redefining Indian universities. How can such an exercise be carried out?

One way (and others surely exist) is by continuing Sarkars engagement with Aristotle. Aristotelian teleology is a useful conceptual tool when trying to tease out the rationale or purpose behind something and, in that context, is particularly suited to a discussion on the idea of a university. Sarkar, however, chooses to engage with Aristotles three-tier knowledge protocolepisteme, techne and phronesisand posits episteme as the primary idea of a university for reasons that are not clear. An Aristotelian approach to conceptualising a university would not unquestioningly privilege episteme but would raise questions regarding the telosthe purposeof a university. This approach to conceptualising a university requires one to step back and think about how universities fit into the larger schema of a society while being guided by practical wisdom, that is, phronesis. Explaining phronesis as practical wisdom where knowledge becomes utilitarian and is guided by practical, instrumental rationality and governed by a chosen goal does not do justice to a term that Aristotle felt was exemplified by people who were good in managing city states. Phronesis is not just knowledge for Aristotle, but is virtue-linked knowledge that is exhibited when one deliberates about a particular and takes a decision keeping in mind the general; what is good for the individual as well as humans in general (and hence exemplified by statesmen). In the polarised times that we live in, where a constant tension seems to exist between the state on the one hand and the university on the other, falling back on Aristotelian teleology seems imperative, not optional. But what exactly is Aristotelian teleology and how can it be used as a conceptual tool to understand the idea of a university?

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 12th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.