ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Majoritarian Politics and the Ayodhya Verdict

The Ayodhya verdict favours politics over history. It bypasses the settled principles of legal scrutiny in adjudicating land conflicts. Such a verdict has detrimental ramifications for democracy and constitutional values. 

On 9 November 2019, the Supreme Court delivered the final judgment in the much awaited AyodhyaBabri Masjid land dispute case. The citizens by and large, welcomed the verdict. The Courts judgment has succeeded in settling the inordinately delayed land dispute by providing the right of possession of land to one party over another. The order, however, has wider implications for the culture, society, economy and polity of the country. This judgment will become a reference document for future generations to understand and reflect upon how law intersects with historicity, religion, and crucially, the political economy of the country. 

Contrary to the general understanding that the court judgments are beyond the purview of politics, this order of the apex court conveyed the impression that it is amenable to the political circumstances and factors, especially in dealing with sensitive land dispute cases. It is true that the Constitution provides a governing framework for the country. However, it is the politics that determines the form, shape and direction of the governance. The judiciary is a constituent part of the whole institutional arrangement of governance. To understand the verdict from the perspective of politics in particular, it is important to understand the majoritarian regime of the contemporary times, and get a comprehensive picture of the interface between law, polity and society. 

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.