ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Four Transfers and One Saving Grace

The controversies over the transfers of judges have brought the collegium’s credibility to a nadir in recent times. The absence of proper justification for its decisions, especially given the allegations of government interference, have only served to show why lack of transparency is harmful. In this context, the decision to discuss and debate allegations against nominee judges is a small but welcome step.

In the recent past, the Supreme Court collegium has been buffeted by multiple controversies over the transfer of high court judges, causing questions to be raised about its independence and fairness. These controversies relate to the murky circumstances surrounding the transfers of four high court judges, recalling the dark days of the Emergency when 16 judges were transferred out of their home states for having delivered judgments against the union government (Baxi 1980: 198). Whereas the reasons for Emergency-era transfers, even if not shown on official papers, were fairly clear, the reasons for the present transfers have given rise to much speculation, with opacity only leading to more doubt about the collegiums independence and fairness.

In this column, I discuss the four transfers in some detail, pointing out how the collegium has no one but itself to blame for the falling faith in its functioning. The widespread dissatisfaction with the collegiums functioning, however, does not seem to have gone entirely unnoticed by the collegium itself. I intend to also discuss a recent practice initiated by it that suggests, perhaps, that the collegium might be willing to learn and change.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.