ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Did Demonetisation Accelerate Financial Inclusion?

The claim that removing cash would improve financial access for the poor has become a fallback argument for demonetisation, despite notebandi failing to achieve its other objectives. Like many other arguments made for abolishing cash in favour of digital payments, this claim does not stand up to scrutiny.

On 8 November 2016, without warning, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the Indian nation that all 500 and 1,000 paper notes would cease to be legal tender at the stroke of midnight, turning, by decree, 86% of Indias legal tender into Cinderella notes (Arunachalam 2017). Modi said this would flush out black money and help combat counterfeiting, tax evasion and terrorism, all central themes of the ruling partys agenda. Within a few weeks, the administration had added an additional justification: demonetisation would advance financial inclusion and the countrys transition to Digital India. The Ministry of Labour and Employment claimed demonetisation would lead to more bank accounts being used for salary payments; Nandan Nilekani, architect of the Aadhaar identification system, hailed demonetisation as a tenfold accelerator of digitisation; and former government advisors-cum-bankers praised it for driving habit-change towards a cashless society (Lahiri 2016). The Prime Minister himself tweeted about methods of digital payment in Hindi and English and, in emotive speeches, linked the cashless society to his promise to voters of delivering the India you desired.

It is widely recognised now that demonetisation achieved little in terms of catching black money and battling illegality. But what effects did it have in terms of financial inclusion? If nothing else, did it at least promote greater access to finance? With this short intervention, we situate Indias demonetisation experiment in the context of a global war on cash, and examine data from an India-wide survey to probe for evidence that it accelerated financial inclusion. Our findings challenge the claims, made often with minimal or no evidence in demonetisations immediate aftermath, that demonetisation was a pro-poor endeavour and led to increased financial inclusion and this momentum should be continued (Kumar and Kumar 2016). Instead, our findings confirm those of other recent research which found that the uptake of digital transactions among the banked poor remained minimal, and changes in savings behaviour were negligible.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here


To gain instant access to this article (download).

INR 59

(Readers in India)

$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 16th Nov, 2018

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.