ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Culture or Conflict?

On Human–Elephant Relations

Conflict, Negotiation, and Coexistence: Rethinking Human–Elephant Relations in South Asia edited by Piers Locke and Jane Buckingham, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016; pp xiii + 366, 995.

 

What is an elephant? Is it a collection of ideas? Is it an amalgamation of human expectations towards an animal, attributed simultaneously with qualities of friendliness, intelligence, and holiness? Or is an elephant a wild, unknowable creature that routinely transgresses human-drawn boundaries? More importantly, should elephants be understood through anthropomorphic qualities of intelligence or comprehension, or viewed as distinctly separate?

In Conflict, Negotiation, and Coexistence: Rethinking HumanElephant Relations in South Asia, the last question assumes the most significance. The book makes an attempt to understand not just how we shape elephant behaviour, but rather how elephants shape us. Piers Locke favours the words free-roaming elephant rather than wild elephant, in an effort to explain that elephants move in paths that are heavily influenced by human presence and impact. In trying to create an ethno-elephantology, the authors ask difficult questions. These questions concern not just why elephants cannot be controlled by man, but why both species should be looked at as co-evolving actorswith elephants as distinctly subjective agents deserving of individual biographies.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 19th Jul, 2018

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.