ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Is the Ghost of Fascism Haunting Political Thought?

The spectre of fascism has continued to haunt political thinking even though original fascism was decisively defeated within a decade. Given the very specific historical conditions in which fascism arose in Europe, whether the term “fascism” significantly applies to more recent forms of authoritarian rule is questionable. Facile reference to the handy historical precedence of European fascism inhibits a genuine understanding of the material conditions that cause authoritarian regimes in the neo-liberal era. More disturbingly, the impressionistic mention of fascism might divert attention from the real issues of resistance to neo-liberalism.

An early version was presented in a forum on fascism organised by ANHAD (Act Now for Harmony and Democracy) in February 2016. Thanks to Apoorvanand, Shabnam Hashmi, Ananya Vajpeyi, and many others for lively discussion. Thanks as well to Noam Chomsky, Akeel Bilgrami, Justin Podur and the reviewer for EPW for insightful comments on recent versions.

The notion of fascism is frequently used these days to describe the rise of a variety of authoritarian regimes in the current neo-liberal era. The use is not restricted to informal and agitated accounts on social media. Even noted political thinkers are now prone to use the term in the theoretical mode to characterise entire regimes. Notions such as democratic fascism, ur-fascism, and Hindutva fascism are increasingly used by scholars to explain attacks by violent sectarian groups who often perform under right-wing official patronage.1

For instance, an editorial in propounds virtually a full theory of semi-fascism. Proposing an Indian version of Nazism, it argues for a politico-economic framework that relates the pernicious ideology of Hindutva, the monstrous inequality in India, and the effects of colonialism (EPW 2017). I share the deep anxiety concerning the disturbing phenomena of pernicious ideology, monstrous inequality, and catastrophic effects of virulent neo-liberal economic policies. However, the question arises whether theoretical uses of the concept of fascism are justified to understand the increasing loss of democratic space in the so-called free world. For the restricted purposes of this article, I will be primarily concerned with some of the prominent recent conceptions of fascism proposed by noted thinkers. It is a study of systematic confusions in the concept of fascism in the recent literature that attempts to understand regimes in the neo-liberal era. In that sense, my goals are critical and polemical.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 236

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 12

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 13th Jul, 2018

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.