ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Atal Pension Yojana

A Critical Appraisal

Atal Pension Yojana

The Atal Pension Yojana—an old-age pension scheme for informal sector workers—is a major initiative to ensure fixed monthly pension for the elderly. This is guaranteed by the government through the provisioning of assured rates of interest during the accumulation and distribution period. An analysis of the benefit patterns and recommendations to make the scheme more attractive for the informal sector workers is presented.

The share of informal workers in total employment in India varies between 80% and 90% depending on the coverage and methodology of estimation. Living conditions of a majority of the elderly population who are working or have worked in this sector are a matter of serious policy concern. What is more important is that the share and numbers of the elderly in the population is increasing at a high rate. Unfortunately, most of the pension schemes or funds for old age in India are for the workers in the formal sector, or a small segment of professionals who can subscribe to self-funded schemes. The Atal Pension Yojana (APY), initiated in 2015 and administered by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA), is a major initiative of the present government. It is a specifically designed model of the National Pension System (NPS) to bring the NPS within easy reach of the economically disadvantaged sections of the society.

There are a few other schemes such as the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS), the Public Provident Fund (PPF), and Unit Trust of India (UTI) Retirement Benefit Pension (RBP), through which informal workers can access financial support in their old age. These schemes, however, have their limitations and are restricted in terms of coverage. The IGNOAPS provides for a small amount of pension and does not reach the intended beneficiaries due to the inadequacies in the distribution system. For the PPF, the funds can easily be diverted and the term of deposit (15 years) is too short for younger workers. The UTI RBP is relatively new and has encountered regulatory challenges. It is difficult to assess whether clients will continue contributing to it in the future. Any option to withdraw all or most of the money before retirement can undermine the scheme’s usefulness for old age as immediate needs take precedence (Mukherjee and Piggot 2013).

Dear reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Updated On : 18th May, 2018

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top