ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Rejection of Kerala’s Fifth State Finance Commission Recommendations

The recent large-scale rejection of the devolution recommendations of the Fifth State Finance Commission by the Kerala government reflects a reversal of past progress, and a move towards fiscal centralisation.

Since the enactment of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act (KPRA), 1994 and the Kerala Municipality Act (KMA), 1994, Kerala has transferred a number of powers and functions previously exercised by the state government; devolved more state resources to local governments (LGs); and promoted decentralised governance. Besides the traditional functions of the local bodies, they have also been assigned new functions, such as the transfer of local level government institutions like hospitals, schools, and krishi bhavans; maintenance of assets of transferred institutions; assignment of more development functions; formulation and implementation of annual plans; delivery of welfare and pension schemes; and implementation of centrally sponsored schemes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.

Kerala has 1,200 LGs, comprising 941 gram panchayats, 152 block panchayats, 14 district panchayats, 87 municipalities and six municipal corporations. Kerala has evolved a sound and effective fiscal decentralisation system, and a share of state taxes and grants are transferred to the LGs to meet their expenditure based on the recommendations of successive State Finance Commissions (SFCs). In the past, Kerala also had a history of timely constitution of SFCs and implementation of their recommendations on devolution. Regarding the transfer of powers and functions, decentralised governance, fiscal decentralisation and implementation of decentralised planning, Kerala achieved substantial progress compared to other states in India. But, an unfortunate and disturbing development that has occurred recently is the delay in the implementation of the Fifth State Finance Commission (Fifth SFC) report by two years, and rejection of most of the devolution recommendations.

Dear reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Updated On : 6th Apr, 2018

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top