ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Contestations of the RTI Act

A Labyrinthine Practical Regime

The Right to Information Act, 2005 holds out the promise that it has the power to cleanse governmental systems in India. The act has made people aware of their rights and, by and large, has been used effectively. However, some provisions of the act leave its users perplexed. This article analyses these provisions and rules that leave interpretation and implementation open to considerable subjectivity. It argues that the practical regime of the RTI Act thusremains labyrinthine.

The views expressed are personal.

The Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter, RTI Act) was enacted because of widespread support for ensuring transparency in governance in India. The definitions given in the act, the clauses regarding exemptions from disclosure, and other provisions, theoretically ensure that workable solutions are reached. But any interpretation of the act that leads to incongruity defeats its very purpose, and thus such interpretations are best avoided. However, on many occasions, the acts provisions have been interpreted in such a manner that its implementation has been almost impossible. The provenance of such interpretations may be attached to diverse understandings of the RTI Act. They have also been commented upon by the higher courts in the past. This article analyses such provisions and rules that leave interpretation and the acts implementation open to considerable subjectivity, and cause confusion among its users.

Poorly Defined Terms

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 20th Jan, 2024

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.