ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Discrimination on Campuses of Higher Learning

A Perspective from Below

We need to understand the many-headed nature of discrimination prevailing on the campuses of higher education in India. This article argues that discrimination, exclusion and humiliation in campuses can be expressed at different levels: in appointments, admission of students, content of curricula of the Social Sciences and Humanities, the way teachers and Dalit students interact, and how upper caste students interact with their Dalit counterparts. The article is based on the narratives of Dalit students and teachers collected purposively from different universities across the country.

Rohith Vemulas suicide in Hydera-bad Central University has raised some very important issues regarding the environment prevailing on the campuses of higher education. We need to ask whether universities have become democratic and inclusive in their ethos. Are they representative in their composition? Is there diversity in the appointment of the heads of the institutionsvice chancellors and directors? Is there diversity in appointing teachersprofessors, associate professors, assistant professors and university employees (officers and clerks)? Do the admissions of students represent diversity? It is important to analyse all this because if all of themheads of institutions, teachers and studentscome from the same social background with their own cultural baggage, then there will be no caste-based discrimination and exclusion on the campuses of higher learning. However, if the composition comprises a minority of actors with a stigmatised natural identity, then discrimination and exclusion are bound to occur.

In this context, by mere observation we can argue that these institutions are not yet inclusive, and hence not democratic. For instance, out of 46 central universities and one open central university only one vice chancellor belongs to the Scheduled Tribe (ST). In Madhya Pradesh, out of 19 universities there is one Scheduled Caste (SC) vice chancellor and in Uttar Pradesh in 25 state universities there is no one from the SC category. These examples are sufficient to bring home the point that these universities are not inclusive. In the same vein, according to information obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act, the University Grants Commission (UGC) revealed that till 200910, out of 1,688 sanctioned professors and 3,298 associate professor posts there were only 24 professors and 90 associate professors in 24 central universities from the SC category. In percentage terms, it is 2.73% and 4.4%, respectively, vis--vis the constitutionally mandated 15% of reservation for SCs.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.