ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Intersectionality

Rejection or Critical Dialogue?

Two responses to Nivedita Menon's "Is Feminism about 'Women'? A Critical View on Intersectionality from India" (EPW, 25 April 2015) appreciate the article's attempt to initiate a debate on "intersectionality." The fi rst piece takes issues with Menon on rejecting intersectionality and argues that feminists should critically examine whether the concept offers any insights into their dilemmas and challenges. The second piece criticises Menon for not clarifying the issues she problematises. This piece also takes on Menon for a not-so-nuanced representation of the women's movement.

In “Is Feminism about ‘Women’? A Critical View on Intersectionality from India” (EPW, 25 April 2015), Nivedita Menon offers a series of arguments that, taken together, amount to a rejection of the concept of intersectionality, at least for feminism in India. Given that this concept has been infrequently discussed in our context, Menon’s piece offers a welcome opportunity to examine it afresh.

In this response I suggest that instead of dismissing intersectionality, we might be better off engaging with it. This requires us to critically examine whether it offers any insights into our questions, dilemmas and challenges. Such an examination is rendered difficult by the fact that intersectionality has often been enmeshed in confusion and seems to invite misinterpretation.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.