ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Microfinance Remains Relevant

Another response to David Hulme and Mathilde Maitrot's "Has Microfi nance Lost Its Moral Compass?" (EPW, 29 November 2014), which takes a closer look at the role and working of microfinance institutions in India

The paper “Has Microfinance Lost Its Moral Compass?” by David Hulme and Mathilde Maitrot (EPW, 29 November 2014) is correct in some of its basic postulations, however too many generalisations abound, which need discussion. It speaks of mainstream finance and microfinance, as if they were monolithic and non-differentiated sectors.

While it is true that the global financial crisis of 2008 was a result of the risky financial behaviour of leading multinational banks and investment banks, mostly located in West Europe and North America, which focused purely on making huge profits through numerous mechanisms including over-leveraging, exploiting regulatory loopholes, designing unintelligible exotic products and misinforming their clientele, the entire mainstream finance sector need not be tarred with the same brush. Mainstream finance consists of not only giant multinational banks and investment banks, but also of a large number of savings banks, retail banks, community banks and cooperative banks, which are basically small institutions located in specific regions and catering to the financial needs of common people, medium and small enterprises, and traders and communities at large.

Dear reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attracive subscription offers.

Click here

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top