A+| A| A-

The End of Hope?

With no binding commitment on the part of the developed countries, Copenhagen was a dead deal.

Outside of a handful of developed countries, the universal assessment of the recently concluded climate change negotiations at Copenhagen has ranged from failure to disaster. Most of those who had followed the negotiation process leading to Copenhagen had already warned, as early as October 2009, that no great advances could be expected at the fortnight long Conference of Parties (CoP) at the Danish capital and “sealing the deal” would be near impossible. Yet, there was hope that the broad parameters of a future deal would be agreed to at Copenhagen based on the principles of equity and justice. In the end, what emerged as the “Copenhagen Accord” has been a divisive, unfair document which was pushed through on the insistence of a few powerful countries and the hosts, but which does not have the stamp of approval to render it an official document of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Concerted attempts by the developed countries, which have been the main polluters of the environment over the past century and more, to dump the Kyoto Protocol (KP) which set binding targets on them to reduce their carbon emissions had been commented on in these columns earlier. While the KP remained very modest in its emission reduction targets and depended too heavily on market mechanisms to reach its goals, it made a clear and fair distinction between the principal polluters – the developed countries – who were listed under Annex 1 of the protocol and those who were not the polluters but suffered nonetheless. Further, it provided mechanisms by which the Annex 1 countries would give the developing and underdeveloped countries know-how and funds to overcome the consequences of climate change and adopt green technologies. Both these promises remained unfulfilled by the principal polluters. The United States, which has contributed more than a quarter of all global carbon emissions, refused to join the KP and remains among the highest polluters of the planet.

To read the full text Login

Get instant access

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

₹826for India

$50for overseas users


(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Biden’s policy of the “return to the normal” would be inadequate to decisively defeat Trumpism.

*/ */

Only a generous award by the Fifteenth Finance Commission can restore fiscal balance.

*/ */

The assessment of the new military alliance should be informed by its implications for Indian armed forces.

The fiscal stimulus is too little to have any major impact on the economy.

The new alliance is reconfigured around the prospect of democratic politics, but its realisation may face challenges.

A damning critique does not allow India to remain self-complacent on the economic and health fronts.


The dignity of public institutions depends on the practice of constitutional ideals.

The NDA government’s record in controlling hunger is dismal despite rising stocks of cereal.


Caste complacency of the ruling combination necessarily deflects attention from critical self-evaluation.

Rape atrocities tragically suggest that justice is in dire need of egalitarian commitment by every citizen.

Back to Top