ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Tatas and Singur

This refers to the article “Singur: What Happened, What Next and Time to Pay the Cost” by D Bandyopadhyay (EPW, 29 November 2008).

The view that the Tatas left Singur v oluntarily is seriously awed. As users, the Tatas were entitled to presume that the land seller complied with the relevant laws and that the government would e nsure law and order. Instead, they faced continuous and violent opposition, were prevented from carrying on normal c om mercial activity and suffered damage to property.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.