ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

The Ninth Schedule Decision

The Supreme Court's decision to judicially review any law incorporated to the Ninth Schedule post April 24, 1973, brings certain troubling questions of constitutional significance to the fore. It exposes the flexibility and vagueness associated with the "basic structure doctrine" and provides an understanding of the vast powers the judiciary has amassed because of the nature of that doctrine.

Time to Define the Constitutions Basic Structure

F or three decades now, the landmark basic structure doctrine has formed the bedrock of Indias constitutional jurisprudence. The doctrine, established by the Supreme Court (SC) in Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (AIR 1973 SC 1461), limits the Parliaments power to amend the Constitution. In Kesavananda Bharati, the SC held that Article 368 of the Constitution does not provide the Parliament with the absolute power to amend the Constitution. The limitation was that the basic structure of the Constitution could not be altered. Inevitably, the doctrine has profound implications for the role of the judiciary in democratic societies and any theory of separation of powers. Although the legitimacy of the doctrine has been the subject of much controversy, the debate has subsided in recent years. The decision of the SC in I R Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu ((2007) 2 SCC 1) that examined the permissible extent of judicial review of the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution brings the basic structure doctrine back into sharp focus and provides us with an opportunity to revisit this subject.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.