ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

Whither Public Health

Lattars

Whither Public Health

A
letter doing the rounds in US universities is revealing. It says that the Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH) of the US has been asked to facilitate the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) – which was launched by the prime minister on March 28 – in identifying faculty with expertise and passion, to assist in the development of new and independent schools of public health, design curricula, build departments/ disciplines, mentor Indian faculty, and teach courses, all within four weeks to a year. The letter implies that it is child’s play to draw a suitable curriculum for public health in India. But, obviously, the Indian medical bureaucracy has not taken its own professionals into confidence, and they will now have to wait for the building of their capacity to manage public health.

Curiously, the union health secretary (now a member of PHFI’s board) – after placing the socially irrelevant reproductive and child health II (RCH II) at the core of the national rural health mission (NRHM) – is reported to have pontificated, “public health practitioners need to understand the social, economic and environmental determinants of health” (The Indian Express, March 20, 2006). He does not appear to know that India was the first country to use social science studies in its national programmes: successfully in the national tuberculosis programme, and unsuccessfully when American demography shaped the family welfare programme. The Indian Express also reported that finances for the “autonomous” PHFI are to come from US financial donors and Indian industrial houses. The working draft, marked confidential but circulated to US institutions, proposes a chain of institutions to raise an army of public health experts, led by the head of the US ASPH, to train doctors, managers, analysts, demographers, epidemiologists, and community health workers. AIDS and dengue fever are the “challenge of public health”, and the root causes are “shortage of professionals, small-scale and questionable quality of current schools of public health, and absence of high quality public health research agency”. The empowered financing committee has passed the proposal and the Foundation proposes to pay scales higher than the government institutes! Thus, while primary health centres are being curtailed to “save” money under NRHM, the Bill Gates Foundation has the freedom to push resources where it wants in the name of collaboration among selected “stakeholders”.

The idea of new AIIMS-like institutes is not new. What is new is the thought that the country cannot either mobilise its own intellectual resources to define public health needs and develop the required curricula, or

(Continued on p 2036)

Corrections
  • (1) In the article ‘Housewife, Sex Worker and Reformer: Controversies over Women Writing Their Lives in Kerala’ (Review of Women’s Studies, April 29, 2006), p 1681, column 1, para 2, sentence 2 should read, “Indeed, the text dismantles the image central to the first version, of Jameela as ‘liberated’ woman (contrasted with feminists who are not), outside mainstream society and therefore somehow less subject to patriarchy” instead of “Indeed, the text dismantles the image central to the first version, of Jameela as “liberated” woman, (contrasted with feminists who are outside mainstream society and therefore, somehow less subject to patriarchy).”
  • (2) In the article ‘Diffusion of Development’ (May 6, 2006), two references dated 2004 and 2006 (p 1772) have been wrongly attributed to the author Prabhat Patnaik instead of to Utsa Patnaik.
  • (3) In the article ‘Great Indian Story of Convertibility’ (May 13, 2006), in the first para, “March 2005” (p 1881) should have been “March 2006”.
  • Subscription

    Inland

    (Rs)

    Six One Two Three months year years years

    Institutions – 1250 2300 3300 Individuals 500 935 1750 2500

    Concessional Rates

    Teachers/Researchers – 685 – 1800 Students – 450 – –

    Concessional rates are available only in India. To avail of concessional rates, certificate from relevant institution is essential. Remittance by money order/bank draft preferred. Please add Rs 35 to outstation cheques towards bank collection charges.

    Nepal and Bhutan

    Institutions – 1500 – 4150 Individuals – 1250 – 3500

    Foreign

    (US $)

    Air Mail Surface Mail

    Institutions

    1yr 2yrs 3yrs 1yr 2yrs 3yrs Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh 80 150 200 65 120 175 Other countries 150 275 375 90 170 240

    Individuals Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh 50 90 125 30 50 75 Other countries 100 175 240 65 120 170

    All remittances to:

    Economic and Political Weekly

    Economic and Political Weekly

    Hitkari House, 284 Shahid Bhagatsingh Road, Mumbai 400 001 Phones: 2269 6072/73 Fax: (022) 2269 6072 epw.mumbai@gmail.com edit@epw.org.in Editor (December 1969-January 2004) : Krishna Raj

    Editor : C Rammanohar Reddy

    Deputy Editor : Bernard D’Mello

    Assistant Editors : Anuradha Kumar, Vimala Subramanian, Sheba Tejani Bharati Bhargava (Delhi)

    Editorial Staff : Prabha Pillai

    Editorial Consultant : Gautam Navlakha (Delhi)

    Circulation : Gauraang Pradhan (Manager), B S Sharma circulation@epw.org.in

    Advertisement Manager : Kamal G Fanibanda advt@epw.org.in

    General Manager and Publisher : K Vijayakumar

    EPW Research Foundation

    C 212, Akurli Industrial Estate, Kandivali (East) Mumbai 400 101, Phones: 2887 3038/3041 Fax: (022) 2887 3038. epwrf@vsnl.com

    Director : S L Shetty

    Economic and Political Weekly May 20, 2006

    Lattars

    (Continued from p 1934)

    rejuvenate the over 200 medical colleges and their preventive and social medicine (PSM) departments. It is difficult to see humour in a situation that evokes only sadness. It is even more disconcerting to believe that those trained by India’s premier institutions will have no hesitation in joining consultancy firms to serve private capital for professed enrichment of Indian public health, and be willing to forgo what is vital for the country’s intellectual independence. In the 21st century, when linking up with the rest of the world with confidence and on our own terms is possible, a publicprivate partnership is quietly smuggled in to accommodate a political mentor. Why is India unable to define its public health needs and invite the best minds and proven practices from all over the world? Why are consultancy firms with no experience of public health, like McKinsey, given contracts to run public health projects and learn on the job when it collaterally damages the services by focusing on AIDS alone? Are we under the illusion that this is an altruistic step on the part of the donors?

    The PHFI seems to be important to both the American and the Indian governments, one needing the markets, the other more resources to increase middle class consumption patterns. In the process, what is being neatly avoided is that public health is not just the amalgamation of social sciences, health management, and epidemiology, but the integration of their perspectives. Consequently, the vision of a public health that is inclusive as well as comprehensive may get further postponed. Unless the islands of excellence deal with the new epidemics (farmer suicides, hunger, violence against the poor, their shattered homes and livelihoods, falling food availability, and disappearing little girls), and reach out to the existing medical colleges and their PSM departments that train important components of human resources in public health, there can be no revival of the same.

    IMRANA QADEER

    New Delhi

    Notes to Contributors

    Here are some guidelines fortake up to six to eight months fromthe address, day-time phone numbers andauthors who wish to make date of acceptance to appear in the email address. submissions to the journal. EPW. Every effort will, however, be made (The email address of writers in the Special

    to ensure early publication. Papers with Article, Commentary and Discussion

    Special Articles

    immediate relevance for policy would be sections will be published at the end ofEPW welcomes original research papers in considered for early publication. Please the article.)

    any of the social sciences.

    note that this is a matter of editorial * Authors are requested to prepare their

    * Articles must be no more than 8,000

    judgment. soft copy versions in text formats. PDF

    words, including notes, references

    versions are not accepted by the EPW.

    and tables. Longer articles will not be Commentaries

    Authors are encouraged to use UK Englishprocessed. EPW invites short contributions to the spellings (Writers using MS Word or

  • * Contributions should be sent in a hard ‘Commentary’ section on topical social, similar software could change thecopy format accompanied by a floppy/ economic and political developments. These appropriate settings in the LanguageCD version. A soft copy can also be should ideally be between 1,000 and 2,500 menu of the application).sent by email. Hard and soft copy words and exclusive to the EPW. * Contributors are requested to send articlesversions of articles are essential for Short contributions may be sent by email. that are complete in all respects, includingprocessing. references, as this facilitates quicker
  • * Special articles should be Book Reviews processing.accompanied by an abstract of a EPW sends out books for review. It does not * When there are major developments in
  • maximum of 150-200 words. normally accept unsolicited reviews. How-the field of study after the first submission,
  • * Papers should not have been ever, all reviews that are received are read authors can send a revised version. simultaneously submitted for publication with interest and where a book has not been EPW requests writers not to sendto another journal or newspaper. If the sent out for review, the unsolicited review is revised versions based on stylisticpaper has appeared earlier in a different on occasion considered for publication. changes/additions, deletions ofversion, we would appreciate a copy of references, minor changes, etc, as this
  • Letters

    this along with the submitted paper. poses challenges in processing.

    Readers of EPW are encouraged to send comments and suggestions (300-400 words)

    * Graphs and charts prepared in MS * All submissions will be acknowledged

    Office (Word/Excel) or equivalent software immediately on receipt with a reference

    on published articles to the Letters column. number. Quoting the reference numberare preferable to material prepared in All letters should have the writer’s full name in inquiries will help.

    jpeg or other formats.

    and postal address. * EPW posts all published articles on its web processing of the papers we receive.

    * Every effort is taken to complete early site and may reproduce them on CDs.

    Discussion

    Since we receive more than 35 articles Address for communication:

    EPW encourages researchers to comment

    every week and adequate time has to be Economic and Political Weekly,

    on Special Articles. Submissions should be

    provided for internal reading and external Hitkari House,

    1,000 to 2,000 words.

    refereeing. It can take up to four 284 Shahid Bhagatsingh Road, months for a final decision on whether General Guidelines Mumbai 400 001, India. the paper is accepted for publication. * Writers are requested to provide full Email: edit@epw.org.in,

    * Articles accepted for publication can details for correspondence: postal epw.mumbai@gmail.com

    Economic and Political Weekly May 20, 2006

    Dear reader,

    To continue reading, become a subscriber.

    Explore our attractive subscription offers.

    Click here

    Comments

    (-) Hide

    EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

    Back to Top