ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846
-A A +A

Enron and Prayas: Some Reservations

Prayas has said in its note (EPW, June 9-15, 2001) that a judicial enquiry into the making of the contract with the Enron (Dabhol Power Corporation) would help us avoid the contract if the findings of the Inquiry Commission clearly show that the power was not exercised properly by the concerned authorities. While I support the demand for judicial enquiry because such an enquiry will help us reform the law and make the process of government contracts more transparent and inject greater accountability, I do not agree that an adverse finding by the Judicial Commission would help us rescind the contract. An adverse finding would certainly help in locating the responsibility on organisations as well as people who took those decisions. But, just because representatives of the Maharashtra Electricity Board or the Maharashtra government have not applied their minds, have not taken relevant considerations into account or have acted mala fide, which could have been the grounds for quashing their actions, may not be grounds enough for avoiding a contract with a foreign company where the government has specifically agreed to have all matters of dispute settled through an international arbitration.



Subscribers please login to access full text of the article.

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

826for India

$50for overseas users

Get instant access to the complete EPW archives

Subscribe now

Comments

(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top