ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

The Constitution at Work

Constitutional Questions in India: The President, Parliament and the States by A G Noorani; Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2000; pp 353, Rs 525.

We live in constitutionally troubled times. A constitution designed for better times is finding it difficult to cope with the indisciplined free-for-all greed and corruption of the kali yuga. Parasaras Dharmasastra asserts that the dharma of each yuga is different (yuga rupa anusaritah). Indian jurists, dharmasastris, have argued that dharma is constant only its interpretation changes. Can we say the same for the Constitution? Will interpretation save and adapt the Constitution to Indias changing needs? Or are we looking for something new? The BJP coalitions all-purpose Constitutional Reform Committee was, and remains, a fraudulent ploy with an undeclared agenda, a mixture of good and doubtful appointees and pregnant with a rag-bag of dangerous prescriptive possibilities. Between 1946 and 1949, India was lucky to be able to evolve a complicated consensus for a complex civilisation-state after protracted negotiations. Pakistan failed to do so. So did Israel. Just because the Constitution has been amended 85 times does not mean that consensus to a major change can be vouchsafed. If the case for a new consensus-Constitution is pressed, the present Constitution may collapse without an appropriate replacement. If such a case is not pressed, we have to make what we can of the Constitution we have. This is what makes Nooranis quest for settled prescriptions of constitutional practice, which will be binding on our rulers, meaningful as an act of necessity.

The Constitution can broadly be classified into its political texts (which are concerned with governance) and the justice texts (which are concerned with its goals and human rights). The political texts are concerned with parliamentary governance, federalism, the broad parameters of judicial independence and an assortment of other things including the amendment of the Constitution. Nooranis book is concerned with the complex working of the parliamentary system with special reference to the relationship between the president, prime minister, the government and their respective cabinets. If the bare text of the Constitution is looked at face value, we have a presidential system in which an indirectly elected president rules the roost on the advice of the cabinet. But, after Justice Mukerjees judgment in the Punjab textbook case (1955) and Justice Krishna Iyers judgment in Shamshers case (1974), there is no room for constitutional error even if presidents have correctly claimed the power to be informed and to encourage and warn. The Indian system is modelled on the British which, in turn, replete with its conventions, had a pervasive influence on Indian thinking, in letter if not spirit, subject to Indian variations in its constitutional texts. This being the situation, how should Indian practice be devised? On the basis of British practice towards which Noorani has a bias? Or should these issues be treated as open to determination on principle? And, if principles are to be devised, on what should they be based? Should principles of accountability, stability and expediency be non-neutral in their universal application or created ad hoc to meet crisis.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.