ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846
-A A +A

WOMEN- Conjugal Rights vs Personal Liberty- Andhra High Court Judgment

Conjugal Rights vs Personal Liberty Andhra High Court Judgment Vimal Balasubrahmanyan ON July I this year, Justice P A Chowdhary of the Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 9 of the'Hindu Marriage Act (1955) as violative of Article 21 of the Constitution. Under Section 9, when either wife or husband has without reasonable excuse withdrawn from the other's society, the aggrieved party may apply to the court for restitution of conjugal rights According to the judgment in the case of Venkata Subbiah against his wife, film actress Sareetha, it was held that Section 9 constitutes the grossest form of violation of an individual's privacy and human dignity which are both included in the fundamental right to life and personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. Saree- tha's plea against her husband's petition for restitution of conjugal rights was that the provision was unconstitutional. This plea was upheld by the court.

Subscribers please login to access full text of the article.

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

826for India

$50for overseas users

Get instant access to the complete EPW archives

Subscribe now


(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top