ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846
-A A +A

Who Won in West Bengal

September 9, 1972 of state governments. It is well known that some states, with enlightened Directorates of Mines and Geology, have made rapid progress in the field, through a combination of good geological groundwork and a sound licensing policy. The proposed amendment would certainly act as a damper to these departments. In the less efficient departments on the other hand the same provision could offer a handle for further delay and corruption. Prospecting and mining leases is a state subject, and an ambivalent statute should not be introduced. (Reading the fine print, 4A(1) ends with words "as it may think fit". It is not clear whether 'it' refers to the Centre or the state.) The new Section states that a cancelled lease must thereafter be granted to a government enterprise. This point too needs clarification. The main purpose of the whole Act is to conserve the mineral resources of the country. If a mineowner is mining unscientifically, warning him, or cancelling his lease, is certainly desirable. But on what grounds should the lease go to a government enterprise? There may not be a suitable government agency, or the agency may not particularly want the lease

Subscribers please login to access full text of the article.

New 3 Month Subscription
to Digital Archives at

826for India

$50for overseas users

Get instant access to the complete EPW archives

Subscribe now


(-) Hide

EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear. A comment, if suitable, may be selected for publication in the Letters pages of EPW.

Back to Top