ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

A+| A| A-

जोखिमपूर्ण राजनीतिक प्रस्ताव के रूप में भविष्यवाणी

.

The translations of EPW Editorials have been made possible by a generous grant from the H T Parekh Foundation, Mumbai. The translations of English-language Editorials into other languages spoken in India is an attempt to engage with a wider, more diverse audience. In case of any discrepancy in the translation, the English-language original will prevail.

 

Let me start with a disclaimer that I am not talking about the predictability associated with electoral analysis that the election experts, commentators and observers undertake from time to time. Neither am I talking about predictions that find their expression in the trends of election results tracked down through the method of the exit poll. These are attempts about prediction that are visualised through observing the political mood of the voters with whom the observers interact during the pre-election times. This conception of predictability may be useful in one particular sphere of politics, but it may not be so in another sphere. We need to look at the word predictability from a different angle, so crucial for understanding party politics in particular, the main concern of which is to capture power. An argument can be made to say that the conception of predictability as perceived by a political party or parties is different from that understood by experts and analysts. The issue at hand is the expectation of political parties that voters must vote in a particular fashion, in a particular direction that will brighten the electoral prospects of such parties.

The prediction about voters choice is contingent upon the formers construction as the prospective voter who would vote according to the designs of a particular party. However, their construction is qualitatively different from the electoral mobilisation of voters. Certain parties make efforts to mobilise voters around the practical questions that the latter continue to face. In such mobilisation, voters exercise their political autonomy in sharing the efforts made by certain political parties. The construction of voters, on the other hand, involves efforts by a particular party whose singular focus is strategising how to make the voters choices predictably favourable. As has been noticed in the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha general elections, the politics of constructing predictably favourable voters is achieved primarily through raising emotional issues, making false promises, planting fake news, and even speaking blatant lies.

Dear Reader,

To continue reading, become a subscriber.

Explore our attractive subscription offers.

Click here

Or

To gain instant access to this article (download).


Pay
INR 59

(Readers in India)


Pay
$ 6

(Readers outside India)

Published On : 27th Dec, 2019

Support Us

Your Support will ensure EPW’s financial viability and sustainability.

The EPW produces independent and public-spirited scholarship and analyses of contemporary affairs every week. EPW is one of the few publications that keep alive the spirit of intellectual inquiry in the Indian media.

Often described as a publication with a “social conscience,” EPW has never shied away from taking strong editorial positions. Our publication is free from political pressure, or commercial interests. Our editorial independence is our pride.

We rely on your support to continue the endeavour of highlighting the challenges faced by the disadvantaged, writings from the margins, and scholarship on the most pertinent issues that concern contemporary Indian society.

Every contribution is valuable for our future.