Section 377: EPW's Contribution to the Discourse

Here are the articles that the Supreme Court cited in its judgment to decriminalise Section 377. We have taken these articles out of paywall for the next two weeks.

1. In 2008, Animesh Sharma wrote, “The state cannot use its power to punish a particular practice on grounds of immorality only because a majority believe it to be so.” 



2. Alok Gupta’s 2006 article on #Section377 examined how the idea of consent was not applied to homosexual sex which made it synonymous to rape, and saw homosexuality as perverse. 


3. Danish Sheikh’s 2017 article discussed how the Puttaswamy judgment was an important watershed in the history of #LGBTQ rights in India because it acknowledged the “chilling-effect” #Section377 has with regard to constitutional rights.


4. For a more comprehensive view about the how thought regarding homosexuality has evolved through the decades in EPW's pages, read Engage’s reading list.



Must Read

Justice Indu Malhotra set a dangerous precedent by stating that courts should not delve into the rationality of religious practices. This article contests the arguments made by this lone dissenter to...
Studies on sexual harassment complaint committees over the years highlight how committees, even when instituted, often do not function as they should. 
Two judgements in August 2017 came under the scanner for the language they used to define consent and talk about survivors of sexual assault.
Though atheism has been socially prevalent in India, it has remained a grey area in the legal context. There are no specific laws catering to atheists and they are considered as belonging to the...
Several unconstitutional laws in India repress its citizens. A reading list from the EPW Archives.
The prevention of torture has been one of the key human rights developments in the last decade. With India’s strong stake for a seat at the security council, the issue has assumed importance. However...
Reform is long overdue in the Indian Administrative Services, but how should the government go about it? 
Back to Top