ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

Search

Advanced Search

Articles by Saptarshi MandalSubscribe to Saptarshi Mandal

Section 377: Whose Concerns Does The Judgment Address?

Vol. 53, Issue No. 37, 15 Sep, 2018
The Supreme Court’s recent judgment reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is a landmark on many counts. But while we celebrate the judgment, it is important to remember that Section 377 meant different things to different groups of queer people. While for some it was the symbolic harm of their desire being designated as “unnatural,” for others it had a material significance in their everyday negotiations with harassment and violence in public spaces.

What Do Judges in India Think About Marital Sex?

Vol. 52, Issue No. 52, 30 Dec, 2017
Despite a sensitive understanding of marital sexuality, the judicial discourse on the subject does not involve any mention of consent. This article also highlights four approaches taken by judges towards marital sexuality — seeing sex within marriage as a norm, a pragmatic approach valuing it for its health consequences, a formalist approach of attaching a formal legal function to it, and a moral panic approach warning against attaching legal relevance to sexual dissatisfaction as a criterion for ending marriage.

Adjudicating Disability: Some Emerging Questions

The government intends to replace the Persons with Disabilities Act with a new law, in conformity with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This article maps some of the recent developments in the judicial approach to understanding disability. In interpreting the statutory definition of disability, the focus on the disabling impact of impairments has resulted in the inclusion of a range of impairment groups and disabling conditions, though the basis on which these were included is not known. This approach is problematic, for it associates "disability" with health conditions commonly regarded as "illness".

Disability Law in India: Paradigm Shift or Evolving Discourse?

The inclusion of disability as a subject matter of law and policy is a relatively recent development in India. An analysis of some landmark judgments delivered by the appellate courts between 1996 and 2007 under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act highlights the central characteristics of disability jurisprudence. This analysis provides an insight into the violations faced by persons with disabilities and the nature of litigation coming under the disability laws. It draws attention to the changing understandings of the notions of disability and personhood in society.
Back to Top

EPW

Term & Policy

Circulation

Advertisement

Connect with us