ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

Sanjay G ReddySubscribe to Sanjay G Reddy

Economics beyond the Economists

If inclusive growth and development are to be economically and politically sustainable, they cannot rely only upon ex post transfer measures. This is the fundamental error in conception that growth is to be followed by "redistribution". Inclusivity must be anchored in a productive process characterised by the wide distribution of productive capabilities and thereby of the fruits of growth. An exploration of the "growth vs distribution" debate.

Differently Distorted: The World Bank's 'Updated' Poverty Estimates

The "updated" estimates of global poverty by the World Bank do not address the basic problem with the past and current estimates, which is the lack of a clear criterion for identifying the poor. There is no basis to conclude that the new set of purchasing power parity rates employed to generate the new poverty estimates are closer to the "truth". We can only conclude that they are differently distorted than the earlier ones. There is, however, a feasible alternative method that would place at its core an identification criterion for the poor based on elementary human capabilities. The careful coordination of household surveys and poverty line construction across countries so as to capture whether individuals have the resources necessary to achieve these capabilities can ensure enduring comparability of poverty estimates over time and space.

Poverty Estimates: How Great Is the Debate?

Poverty Estimates: How Great Is the Debate? The Great Indian Poverty Debate edited by Angus Deaton and Valerie Kozel; Macmillan India, New Delhi, 2005;

Unknown: Extent, Distribution and Trend of Global Income Poverty

The estimates of the extent, distribution and trend of global income poverty provided in the World Bank's World Development Reports for 1990 and 2000-01 are neither meaningful nor reliable. The Bank uses an arbitrary international poverty line unrelated to any clear conception of what poverty is. It employs a misleading and inaccurate measure of purchasing power "equivalence" that vitiates international and intertemporal comparisons of income poverty. It extrapolates incorrectly from limited data and thereby creates an appearance of precision that masks the high probable error of its estimates. The systematic distortion introduced by these three flaws is likely to lead to a large understatement of the extent of global income poverty and to an incorrect inference that it has declined. A new methodology of global poverty assessment is feasible and necessary.

World Development Report 2006

In many respects the World Development Report 2006 of the World Bank reflects the most progressive face of the institution. However, even as it is a commendable effort in comparison to many of its predecessors, it is dissatisfying because its intellectual basis is often weak, its contents are not complete and its prescriptions are either questionable or of limited practical value.
Back to Top