More on Direct Cash Transfers
Continuing the debate on direct cash transfers, the authors of the article "The Case for Direct Cash Transfers to the Poor" (12 April 2008) respond to Mihir Shah's criticism (23 August 2008). The six points of contestation by Mihir Shah - including those on the public distribution system and the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme - are refuted. The argument in essence is that seeing the problems with anti-poverty programmes as faulty design and limited availability of resources does not recognise the culture of immunity in public administration and the weak capabilities of local governments.
Subscribe Now !
Get instant access to the complete EPW archives
New 3-Month Subscription to Digital Archives at just Rs 300 for India and $12 for overseas users.
EPW looks forward to your comments. Please note that comments are moderated as per our comments policy. They may take some time to appear.